Wikileaks is not terrorism

United States Vice-President Joe Biden is the most senior government official that I have heard accuse Wikileaks founder of being a terrorist. I find the use of such a word as ‘terrorist’ in this case to be puzzling. Usually terrorists employ bombs to increase fear in general society. People just don’t know when a bomb will go off. At anytime, suddenly your life or the lives of those you love can end. That is the terror of a terrorist.

How does that exactly mesh with someone who is publishing leaked government documents? The comparison between a terrorist and Mr. Assange is ever more puzzling when you consider that there are more easily comparable events in US history. A common comparison has been the Pentagon papers in the 1970s that showed the Vietnam War for the error that it was.

Read more…


Michael Moore posts bail for Assange

My personal attitude towards the Wikileaks is a tad ambivalent. I like the concept of how the information age has made it impossible for the government to keep secrets from its people. On the other hand it is important that State Department employees are able to speak frankly among themselves.

A lot of what has been leaked is embarrassing but pretty petty. I don’t find myself more informed about what the US government is up to because I now know that they refer to Vladimir Putin as an “alpha dog” in internal memos.

But if it these leaks have accomplished anything it has forced me to give my grudging respect for something that Michael Moore has done (and I hate Michael Moore).

Read more…


Computer hacker groups declare war over WikiLeaks [updated/developing]

As the world descends further into absolute insanity, and humankind steps up efforts to hasten it’s demise in time for the end of the Mayan calendar, the friction between the two sides of the WikiLeaks affair has spilled over into an outright cyber war.

The groups 4Chan and Anonymous have promised digital retaliation against organizations and governments who are after WikiLeaks and it’s figurehead, Julian Assange.

Their threats were quickly followed through with action, under what they call Operation:Payback, with an attack on the Swiss Bank, PostFinance who’s website (http://postfinance.ch/) has been knocked clean off the internet. It has been down for around 20 hours and remains offline as of this writing.

PostFinance froze Julian Assange’s account, claiming that he had lied on paperwork, with regards to his place of residence.

The website of the Swedish prosecutors office (http://aklagare.se/) has also been taken offline by 4Chan & Anonymous hackers, and also remains offline as of this posting.

A spokesperson for the hacking group, going by the handle “Coldblood”, has said that anybody “bowing down to government pressure” will be targeted.

In all cases, the corporations under attack, claim that they took their respective actions as a matter of private policy decisions, and not under the influence of the government.  This does not seem to have convinced or abated the group’s activities, which included taking down portions of PayPal’s website today.  Although, their primary site and payment service was not affected.

Today, Visa announced that its account holders will no longer be able to use its payment service to donate money to WikiLeaks. So it remains to be seen just how far this cyber war is going to go.

Not all hackers are on WikiLeaks’ side however.  For weeks, WikiLeaks itself has found itself under attack by “hacktivist” groups, and 4Chan’s website itself came under attack shortly after their declaration of war.

It would seem some very high-stakes battle lines are being drawn in the ether-reaches of cyberspace, that could have serious potential economic and other consequences.

Update: Mastercard’s website (http://www.mastercard.com) has now been taken down by the attacks.

Update 2 (4:00pm ET): PayPal Inc, one of the companies being targeted by the group Anonymous has now admitted that it suspended all donations to the the Wau Holland Foundation in Germany, a group which was accepting donations on WikiLeak’s behalf due to pressure from the US State Department.

From The Gaurdian:

PayPal’s vice-president of platform, Osama Bedier, told an internet conference the site had decided to freeze WikiLeaks’ account on 4 December after government representatives said it was engaged in illegal activity.

“[The US] state department told us these were illegal activities. It was straightforward,” he told the LeWeb conference in Paris, adding: “We … comply with regulations around the world, making sure that we protect our brand.”

Though he later reined back the comments, saying that PayPal had not been contacted directly by the state department but had seen a letter it had sent to WikiLeaks, his remarks will undoubtedly intensify criticism from supporters of WikiLeaks that the site is being targeted for political reasons.

Update 3 (4:10pm ET): Visa.com’s website goes down.

Update 4 (4:14pm ET): The payment processing firm used by WikiLeaks is announcing a lawsuit against Visa and MasterCard for cutting off their payment accounts.


Julian Assange and WikiLeaks

Julian Assange

I’ve been watching my colleague Mike Brock and my friend Jesse Klein trying to set the record straight about Julian Assange and WikiLeaks for a while.

As most probably know already, Assange is the public face of WikiLeaks. His organization receives information from whistle blowers and other sources, assesses it, and then releases the information to the world in a way that protects the original sources.

I believe this is an accurate statement of what WikiLeaks does, free of invective.

A large portion of the information WikiLeaks has released lately comes from Bradley Manning, a private in the U.S. army. In providing the information to the organization, Manning broke his oath to the military and a myriad of other laws. He may be guilty of treason.

Assange is not an American, let alone a member of the U.S. military. He has taken no oaths to the United States of America. He did not gain the information WikiLeaks has released by hacking into a secure computer network. He did not bribe Manning to give him the information; rather, Manning gave it up freely.

No one, except for a few wackos on the far left, has claimed he is releasing fraudulent or otherwise forged documents. The wackos claim he is involved with Mossad, in part because his lawyer has a few high-profile Jewish clients. As the wackos are, in fact, crazy, we shall ignore them.

Read more…


Julian Assange’s defense fund frozen

Via the wikileaks twitter feed comes news that wikileaks founder and frontman Julian Assange’s defense funds have been frozen. Here’s the press release:

The Swiss Bank Post Finance today issues a press release stating that it had frozen Julian Assange’s defense fund and personal assets (31K EUR) after reviewing him as a “high profile” individual.

The technicality used to seize the defense fund was that Mr. Assange, as a homeless refugee attempting to gain residency in Switzerland, had used his lawyers address in Geneva for the bank’s correspondence.

Late last week, the internet payment giant PayPal, froze 60Keur of donations to the German charity the Wau Holland Foundation, which were targeted to promote the sharing of knowledge via WikiLeaks.

WikiLeaks and Julian have lost 100Keur in assets this week.

One of the most fascinating aspects of the Cablegate exposure is how it is throwing into relief the power dynamics between supposedly independent states like Switzerland, Sweden and Australia.

WikiLeaks also has public bank accounts in Iceland (preferred) and Germany.


Filibuster: Wiki-shockers

J.J. McCullough writes:

Read more…


Wikileak and Irony

This is so far my favorite story in connection to the Wikileaks recent activities (from Third Party and Independent Daily):

Germany’s Free Democratic Party, or FDP, is the junior partner in Chancellor Angela Merkel’s ruling coalition between the CDU/CSU and FDP. The party’s chairman is Guido Westerwelle, who is currently serving as Foreign Minister and Vice Chancellor of Germany in Merkel’s cabinet. In Germany’s 2009 general election, the FDP garnered almost 15% of the vote and now holds 93 seats in the German parliament. The FDP is usually referred to as a classical liberal, or libertarian, party for its strong defenses of economic liberalism and civil liberties.

The cable frames the FDP’s support for citizens’ privacy rights and individual liberties as a hindrance to US security strategy, and states that, if it were to join a ruling coalition in Germany, the party would scrutinize any proposals that would require sharing or accessing of information concerning private individuals. The cable faults the party’s “limited government viewpoint” for its opposition to data-sharing measures that would infringe on the privacy rights of individuals.

In a most ironic turn, the leaked cable scoffs at FDP Parliamentarian Gisela Piltz, who cautioned against data-sharing operations with the US government on the grounds that the US government as a whole lacks effective data protection measures even as it accumulates massive amounts of data on innocent citizens.

Silly classical liberals and their mistrust of government.